<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baggagereclaim.co.uk/dont-ask-dont-tell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baggagereclaim.co.uk/dont-ask-dont-tell/</link>
	<description>Self Esteem&#124;Dating&#124;Relationships&#124;Emotional Unavailability&#124;Commitment&#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:22:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Been There Done That</title>
		<link>http://www.baggagereclaim.co.uk/dont-ask-dont-tell/comment-page-1/#comment-110456</link>
		<dc:creator>Been There Done That</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baggagereclaim.co.uk/dont-ask-dont-tell/#comment-110456</guid>
		<description>My mother-in-law decided it was ok to come over and talk to me about an open marriage. It&#039;s not cool at all and very hurtful. When I turned the tables on my husband and told him, hey you don&#039;t mind right, suddenly the atmosphere in our relationship changed. He seemed to be a lot more willing to be a husband...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mother-in-law decided it was ok to come over and talk to me about an open marriage. It&#8217;s not cool at all and very hurtful. When I turned the tables on my husband and told him, hey you don&#8217;t mind right, suddenly the atmosphere in our relationship changed. He seemed to be a lot more willing to be a husband&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad K.</title>
		<link>http://www.baggagereclaim.co.uk/dont-ask-dont-tell/comment-page-1/#comment-29327</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 04:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baggagereclaim.co.uk/dont-ask-dont-tell/#comment-29327</guid>
		<description>Colfire,  I consider &#039;relationship&#039; to be a description of my relationship to a partner.  That doesn&#039;t necessarily imply a reciprocal or exclusive relationship.

The problem I have with the DADT concept, is that is the same relationship a john has with a prostitute (except I understand many prostitutes also hear about everything in the john&#039;s life, but that is the other side of *that* relationship).  

The difference between don&#039;t ask/don&#039;t tell and a plural marriage is vast.  DADT, sleeping around, or open relationship -- that all destroys communication among relationships.  At least with a plural marriage or relationship, where everyone involved is actively involved and communicating, there is opportunity for growth individually and together.  With a plural relationship there is no division of attention, nurturing, or schizophrenic-like division of life from &#039;with this one&#039; to &#039;with that one&#039;.  Energy isn&#039;t wasted living separate lives with different sex partners.

Of course, I just watched &#039;Paint Your Wagon&#039; with Lee Marvin, who buys a Mormon&#039;s second wife -- to share with his Pardner (Clint Eastwood).

An open relationship, or DADT, seems to be a declaration that the primary relationship is dead, no more energy will be put into each other, and that attention and energy will be withdrawn to spend with others.  Something like, &#039;I have gotten comfortable sharing the rent with you, but I don&#039;t think this is where my life is.&#039;  A wimped-out separation, of sorts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colfire,  I consider &#8216;relationship&#8217; to be a description of my relationship to a partner.  That doesn&#8217;t necessarily imply a reciprocal or exclusive relationship.</p>
<p>The problem I have with the DADT concept, is that is the same relationship a john has with a prostitute (except I understand many prostitutes also hear about everything in the john&#8217;s life, but that is the other side of *that* relationship).  </p>
<p>The difference between don&#8217;t ask/don&#8217;t tell and a plural marriage is vast.  DADT, sleeping around, or open relationship &#8212; that all destroys communication among relationships.  At least with a plural marriage or relationship, where everyone involved is actively involved and communicating, there is opportunity for growth individually and together.  With a plural relationship there is no division of attention, nurturing, or schizophrenic-like division of life from &#8216;with this one&#8217; to &#8216;with that one&#8217;.  Energy isn&#8217;t wasted living separate lives with different sex partners.</p>
<p>Of course, I just watched &#8216;Paint Your Wagon&#8217; with Lee Marvin, who buys a Mormon&#8217;s second wife &#8212; to share with his Pardner (Clint Eastwood).</p>
<p>An open relationship, or DADT, seems to be a declaration that the primary relationship is dead, no more energy will be put into each other, and that attention and energy will be withdrawn to spend with others.  Something like, &#8216;I have gotten comfortable sharing the rent with you, but I don&#8217;t think this is where my life is.&#8217;  A wimped-out separation, of sorts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coldfire</title>
		<link>http://www.baggagereclaim.co.uk/dont-ask-dont-tell/comment-page-1/#comment-29250</link>
		<dc:creator>Coldfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 13:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baggagereclaim.co.uk/dont-ask-dont-tell/#comment-29250</guid>
		<description>Call me old-fashioned, but doesn&#039;t &quot;relationship&quot; imply there are only two parties involved?  If one feels shagging around is necessary, one shouldn&#039;t be in a relationship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me old-fashioned, but doesn&#8217;t &#8220;relationship&#8221; imply there are only two parties involved?  If one feels shagging around is necessary, one shouldn&#8217;t be in a relationship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

