While all humans wrestle with failure to some degree, not all of us are felled by it. We don’t all take things not going according to what we saw as The Plan so personally. In fact, some of us have worked out through various experiences that we are distinct from the failure itself. We know that us having failed at something doesn’t mean that we are a failure as a human being.
But plenty of us do take failure very much to heart.
One particular area of failure distortion is relationships. People tend to see breakups and the accumulation of dating and relationship experiences as signs of failure. It’s as if people are more ‘worthy’/’successful’ if they found ‘The One’ immediately, very quickly or without getting hurt.
Repeatedly marking romantic involvements as ‘failures’has a knock-on effect on our wellbeing and future relationships.
‘Failure’ implies that we’ve failed to be and do ‘enough’. Applying this flawed mentality to romantic involvements leads us to choose partners for dubious reasons. We also tend to stay in relationships long past their sell-by-date due to self-doubt and people-pleasing.
Think about it. If we believe worthiness and how much we’re prepared to be/do can make a relationship possible, even one that’s not actually right for us, we already fear that we’re inadequate. As humans, we operate from belief and do what reflects these. So if we think we’re ‘not good enough’, we look for partners to prove this. Enter emotionally unavailable or shady partners. Why? Well, thereare more hoops to jump through. Sure, we might get involved with someone we deem as ‘nice’, ‘lovely’ or ‘perfect’. However, we’re also likely to feel uneasy at the lack of hoop-jumping or feel increased insecurity about ‘blowing our chance’. We put this person on a pedestal and miss signs of incompatibility and/or we self-sabotage. So either way, we wind up with the self-fulfilling prophecy that ‘confirms’ that we’re not enough. And lather, rinse, repeat.
When we see breakups as the outcome, the expression of failure, we believe that we were 100% responsible for the success of the relationship.
And it’s not as if we regard the other person as having failed just as much as us. No, we only take the breakup this personally and regard it and us as a failure because of mistakenly believing that if we had done everything ‘correctly’, then the relationship would have been ‘successful’. That guarantees that we overcompensated in some way. It’s the if I do X, they should do Y and Z should happen mentality that often leads to obsessing and ruminating. It’s believing that any romantic situation we enter into ‘should’ work out if we’ve been and done ‘enough’. Screw compatibility or even whether we truly know, like and trust the person!
But what if what we believe it takes to make a relationship work is in direct opposition to the happiness we seek?
For instance, believing we’ve failed because we couldn’t convince them that we are ‘worthy enough’ or to become emotionally available is a flawed outlook. How we see the problem is the problem. People don’t decide to become who we want to be based on who they deem worthy; they operate based on habit. Emotional availability isn’t the prize we get for proving ourselves ‘enough’. Emotional unavailability reflects a person’s habit of not recognising, acknowledging and expressing their emotions and seeking to limit vulnerability.
No matter the events that led to dates not becoming a relationship or a relationship not lasting, the reason is always the same: incompatibility. This is a combination of both parties, not the sole responsibility of one.
I’ve been running Baggage Reclaim since September 2005, and I’ve spent many thousands of hours writing this labour of love. The site has been ad-free the entire time, and it costs hundreds of pounds a month to run it on my own. If what I share here has helped you and you’re in a position to do so, I would love if you could make a donation. Your support is so very much appreciated! Thank you.
Copyright Natalie Lue 2005-2024, All rights reserved. Written and express permission along with credit is needed to reproduce and distribute excerpts or entire pieces of my work.
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.