An argument of the shady that thrive on crossing boundaries is that their deeds are our fault because they wouldn’t have done what they did if we hadn’t neglected something, or if we were ‘stronger’, more assertive or whatever. Now, granted, in any given situation, we can learn how to uplevel our boundaries. However, even if we coulda, woulda, shoulda done things differently, that doesn’t make us responsible for someone else’s behaviour.
Let’s say that one day, we leave our front door open. An opportunistic so-and-so spots this and walks in and robs and wrecks the gaff. Does that mean that it’s not theft and destruction of property because we left our front door open? Of course not. Fact of the matter is, plenty of people walk past an open door.
It’s like when we lose our wallet or purse. Some people hand it in straight away and everything’s there. Others help themselves to the contents.
So we can be mindful of not leaving our front door open. We can be careful and ensure that we put our property away. But that doesn’t change the fact that some people have the intent to do good, to respect boundaries, and some people don’t.
Let’s not kid (and gaslight) ourselves into the distorted notion that if only we’d taken a firmer rein, said no really loud, not been so nice or naive or whatever that things would have turned out differently. There are plenty of people out there that don’t exploit or abuse others. That wouldn’t see our clear struggle to be assertive or our desire to please others as an opening to hurt us.
We do need to have healthy boundaries and practise self-care so that we do things from a place of having our best interests at heart and valuing the people, things and opportunities that best reflect this. We do need to recognise where, yeah, we’ve neglected ourselves in some way or dropped a ball. These are things that we can learn from, painful as they might be, and create healthier boundaries. But we are not responsible for someone’s character and intentions. And be wary of anyone who tries to convince you otherwise and won’t own their stuff.
I’ve been running Baggage Reclaim since September 2005, and I’ve spent many thousands of hours writing this labour of love. The site has been ad-free the entire time, and it costs hundreds of pounds a month to run it on my own. If what I share here has helped you and you’re in a position to do so, I would love if you could make a donation. Your support is so very much appreciated! Thank you.
Copyright Natalie Lue 2005-2024, All rights reserved. Written and express permission along with credit is needed to reproduce and distribute excerpts or entire pieces of my work.
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.