A lot of people experience deep anxiety in the early stages of dating (what I call stages 0 and 1). Without a doubt, two particular anxiety triggers are sexual intimacy and what’s going to happen next.
Sometimes it’s that we want to have sex but are also afraid of getting hurt or giving the ‘wrong message’. We might obsess about the number of dates so far or how often we communicate with this person. We try to ascertain what we think we know and can expect from this person. When we’re really honest with ourselves, we might not actually want to have sex yet. But anxiety about putting ourselves out of the running for more dates or the hallowed relationship triggers internal pressure. Next thing, we shift from our boundaries and values.
Sometimes it’s that we’re keen to get off the dating merry-go-round and want to ensure that we’re not ‘wasting our time’. Even though we don’t know the person that well or we’re not even sure if we want a relationship withthis person, we’re very anxious and twitchy about getting hurt. We then look for assurances that we can get what they need and want or that this person isn’t like our ex.
So we have sex with the person we’re dating to address the dating anxiety.
It could be that we throw caution to the wind, decide to be totally in the moment, or feel as if we are getting ‘strong signals’ that this person is on the same page as us. Acknowledged or not, though, anxiety is also present.
Within hours, if not minutes, of having sex, the anxiety increases. And then typically, within days, if not hours, this anxiety manifests in behaviour and conversations that leave us deeply confused, unsettled and possibly out of the involvement.
I’ve talked about The Justifying Zone since my first book Mr Unavailable and the Fallback Girl. It’s this place we go to post-sexual intimacy where we look around for reasons to justify our decision to sleep with the person. Retrospectively, we try to plug the gaps of information and find qualities and characteristics to pin on relationship expectations. We’d rather do this than admit that, yeah, we’ve made an error in judgement.
I’ve noticed something else, though, that really speaks to our intentions and the need for us to examine hidden agendas. This is especially so in the lather, rinse, repeat of frustrating dating cycles. And it’s this:
Sleeping with a date is sometimes a backhanded way of attempting to flush out their position or to create what appears to be a legitimate basis for relationship expectations and feelings.
And this is messy as hell. We end up feeling entitled to a relationship or to feel how we do even though the reality of the situation, including what we ignored, say otherwise.
Does a part of us suspect that having sex with a date will flush out someone’s real motives and intentions? It’s a bit like trying to force the ending that we already, on some level, suspect is likely.
Or, is it that we associate relationship possibilities with sex? This means that we have sex so that we can feel justified in expecting a relationship. Or, we have sex to, at the very least, ask the questions and say and do the things that we were not prepared to before having sex. We might even feel entitled to them meeting needs that they weren’t before sleeping with them.
The thing is, having sex doesn’t make us any more entitled to a relationship than we were before we had it. It doesn’t.
And sleeping with someone when there are more holes in our proverbial fact-finding or their story than a pair of fishnet stockings only sabotages our wellbeing.
If we have anxiety, reservations, questions, certain expectations, unmet needs, etc., while dating someone, sex will not solve it. Feeling as if we can ask these things after sexual intimacy is like closing the door after the horse has bolted. That, and we’re making it someone else’s problem that we ignored ourselves in the first place. When we’re honest about our needs, values and boundaries, we stop selling ourselves short. We can be intentional instead of inadvertently setting us up to fail.
I’ve been running Baggage Reclaim since September 2005, and I’ve spent many thousands of hours writing this labour of love. The site has been ad-free the entire time, and it costs hundreds of pounds a month to run it on my own. If what I share here has helped you and you’re in a position to do so, I would love if you could make a donation. Your support is so very much appreciated! Thank you.
Copyright Natalie Lue 2005-2024, All rights reserved. Written and express permission along with credit is needed to reproduce and distribute excerpts or entire pieces of my work.
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.