You’re not entitled to a date or relationship with that certain someone. Even though you might be The Nicest Person on Earth TM or you bent over backwards to accommodate them by busting your boundaries, they’re still allowed to say no. They don’t have to reciprocate your interest, and they’re allowed to not want a relationship. They’re allowed to choose someone else, and you’re also allowed to feel wounded about it. That makes total sense.
You’re a human with feelings and rejection hits hard, especially when it pokes at emotional baggage. Still, that doesn’t entitle you to a relationship or their attention. The fact that they did what they did doesn’t entitle you to trash them.
If they cut you off or step back, you’re not entitled to wage a campaign of harassment against them. That doesn’t mean that their distance isn’t hard to swallow, but you’re not entitled to destroy them. You can’t decide that you’ll talk to the press at thirty-day intervals until they pay your attention-ransom demands. It’s overkill to pair up with other similarly-minded folks and to weaponise your woundedness. You don’t get to spread rumours about them or destroy their life because they dared to move on with someone else or be happy without you in their life. You don’t own them. Incidentally, you’re not exactly making a strong case for repairing and restoring the relationship or for being perceived the way you want to by behaving in this way.
And even if you did nice or wonderful things in the past, these acts aren’t ‘credits’ to spend on bulldozing their boundaries. Being nice doesn’t earn you the right to do what you want now or in the future.
You’re not entitled to a free pass or to keep throwing your good deeds at them while failing to acknowledge your problematic deeds. Someone can appreciate who you are and what you’ve done and also have boundaries.
Because at the end of the day, you’re not entitled to people being and doing what you want because of who you are or what you think you’ve done. The problem isn’t that they didn’t comply; the problem is you believing that they should.
I’ve been running Baggage Reclaim since September 2005, and I’ve spent many thousands of hours writing this labour of love. The site has been ad-free the entire time, and it costs hundreds of pounds a month to run it on my own. If what I share here has helped you and you’re in a position to do so, I would love if you could make a donation. Your support is so very much appreciated! Thank you.
Copyright Natalie Lue 2005-2025, All rights reserved. Written and express permission along with credit is needed to reproduce and distribute excerpts or entire pieces of my work.
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.